Showing posts with label Israeli politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israeli politics. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 2, 2007

The New Addition to the Olmert Spectacle: Livni Enters Public Rebuke


I’ll admit that when the news uprising from the Winograd Report first came out, I had the archetypal response that led to the email I received the following day calling me to pass on the call for Olmert’s resignation, and the NYT article from that same morning reporting on the protest outside Olmert’s house, calling for the same thing. Following up, considering Olmert’s feeble responses and defenses, as well as talkbacks on Israeli news-sites, and the general atmosphere, I was beginning to believe he might be pushed out after all…and if not, it’s just another 3 months, right? Then again the next part of the Lebanon war sage is expected this summer.
Olmert’s approval ratings are even more ridiculous than his statements: 2-3% according to the NYT (whereas the margin of error is 3%...well about the same), and the possibilities for replacements have indubitably been pacing through Israeli minds for a long time. The Winograd report laid a clear, firm responsibility on him for the many failures and discrepancies of the war last summer, and he has accepted them (not that he really had a choice). However, despite the grandiose dissatisfaction that the Israeli people have with the current prime minister, the question of who’s next is perhaps more pertinent than that of when Olmert will step down.
That’s where today’s addition to theבלגן (balagan) comes to place. In a conference today, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni announced that she had asked Olmert to resign. No problem right? That’s what you might think on first site, but when you see the complementary statement, it all changes.
Ms. Livni suggests that since public opinion and the Winograd report have spoken (really more the report than the people, by her speech) Ehud Olmert must oblige everyone and step down from his post, to be replaced by a newly elected member of theקדימה (Kadima) party [elected by vote within the party].
It should bear no surprise that Tzipi is planning to run.

It’s pretty funny how undesirable situations unite a nation. It seems to me that there is a crystal clear consensus as to Israel’s answer to its humble ministress.
“HOLD YOUR HORSES!”
Granted, the attention was shifted to Olmert at the report’s release – maybe Peretz, who is so far beyond simple disapproval that it would be futile to discuss his myriad flaws [though it is inevitable to mention the ridiculous picture in which he posed, peering at a military scene with closed binoculars].
What has been omitted from major conversation, and is now once again surfacing is the plain fact that the war’s failure (as the Winograd report showed) was not Olmert’s fault. It was Kadima’s fault. Even Olmert’s actions were not individual decisions made and carried out from Olmert to the army. Practically everything that happened, happened through the entire party, Livni and Peretz, particularly included, as they both hold powerful positions. Even though Olmert was the acting Prime Minister, Livni is not less to blame than Olmert for the unpreparedness of the army, for the poor judgments in strategy, and most of all for the UN-coordinated cease-fire (with Hezbollah, as well as with Palestinians), which led to a continuation of thousands of rockets being shot at Israel (mostly Sderot), a suicide bombing in Eilat, and many attempts for more. In fact, it is largely Livni’s responsibility that the three kidnapped Israeli soldiers are not yet returned – another big complaint against Olmert (and his administration).
More so, talkbacks on Ynet, Haaretz, and J Post strike at Livni, (rightly) charging her with opportunism, incompetence, equivalency to Olmert, idiocy, lack of ethics/morals, being easily manipulated/swinging with the wind, and much more – some kinder, and others, rather ribald.
The situation is really best defined as one Ynet talk-backer said, “If anyone says it [that Olmert must resign], its okay. But, from Livni, its arrogance.”
I strongly recommend taking a look, for sheer entertainment, if for no other purpose. However, since the vast majority of them are uniformed in concept, a particularly riveting sample or two from each site will suffice.


16. It would be nobel on her part
If it were not for her own true goals and obvious incompetence

Reality Check ,
BaGolan
(05.02.07)


18. Livni ,Show him how it's done !
You are just another puppet politician who is easliy manipulated. You are out of your league. Just another yes,yes maam of Condi Rice and George Bush ! Go back home and bake cookies for the children.

Marcel ,
Florida
(05.02.07)




LIVNI JUST AS RESPONSIBLE!!!!!!
Ben Uziel
Livni thinks she can rewrite history and whitewash herself of responsibility. Israel leadership must be completely replaced. New elections and nothing else!!! until then there will be spin, lie and superficiality to the resolution to many Israeli problems. Livni is as responsible as olmert, to deny this is to deny the whole point of political responsibility within a govt.


Livni Kicks Olmert When He Is Down
Ben Israel
Israel
Tzippi Livni is a complete zero..a political nihilist, post-Zionist with no program other than self-advancement, in other words, like all the rest of the Kadima gang. The government has COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY and she is just as responsible for the disaster. Now she thinks she is only a short step from being Prime Minister...it is truly frightening that someone like her could reach the top job.Her parents were revered fighters in the ETZEL (Irgun) in the pre-state period, so she cashed in on this to get ahead in the Likud even though like most of its "princes" she abandoned their nationalist/Zionist line. She attached herself to Sharon and as he moved to the Left, so did she. Like I said, she is a real nothing.



(Haaretz: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/854673.html)

69. The Mighty & The Greedy Surely Will Fall.NO One In This Crew Is Speaking About National Interest. This Is A True Crime Against The PeopleAdina Kutnicki - US 05/02/2007 23:36
The sharks are circling within Kadima - Kadima, over the cliff. Justice dictates that ALL of these miscreants get tossed overboard. I am NOT in a forgiving mood and do not feel they even deserve life rafts!


34. Where it was sealedCry 05/02/2007 19:55
If the war planning and execution was a disaster, and it was, nothing was over until the end result was sealed at the UN. That was Livni's responsibility. She craves to be liked by Rice more then to advocate Israel's true interests. If you think Olmert is bad, he will seem to have been a great leader if Livni ever becomes PM.



16. Livni: Gutless, Not "The Right Stuff"Ovadiah ben Avraham - Israel 05/02/2007 17:43
If she had made a move against Olmert, I would have called her a Kadima hack opportunist. If she had resigned I would have thought, hmmm, maybe she is in Israeli politics for the long run and the right reasons (to serve). But this gutless flop on her belly before Olmert is repulsive. She *is* the "princess" that the analysts say -- without a patron to promote her, she is nothing on her own. Next.



55. Livni - No Ethics, Honor, or CompetenceJerome Soller 05/02/2007 22:06
If she does not resign, I hope Olmert fires her. She and Peres should resign themselves, before Olmert resigns. Maybe, if Israel is lucky, it can include her in the trade for the kidnapped Israelis. I pray for an Israel with Peres, Livni, and Olmert in no position of responsibility greater than cleaning toilets. Jerome
(http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1178020750384)

OVERALL: There were a few supporting comments towards Livni, but they were miniscule compared to the opposition. There was little talk of a solution to the situation, or steps towards it except for the immediate removal of Kadima (one or two comments advocated keeping Kadima and Olmert). The vast majority of substitute suggestions were for Benjamin (Bibi) Natanyahu – a name I’ve come across often in terms of calls for primacy in Israel. If there were elections held now, I’d guess Bibi would be the likeliest to win (and probably the best to win), but Israelis don’t have much faith in their government right now. Sad as that is, there is very much room for a new generation of politicians of a different class. As Sharon withers away, Peres not far from, and the rest of them hanging from the ledges, the founders of Israel, who had been with it from birth, and who have seen it through it’s first 60 or so years are just about done. A recent article on ynet spoke of signs of a new Zionism and patriotism amongst Israeli youth as uprising, and I can only hope that this is true and prevalent. It is up to the next generation to come up with some leaders who will be credible and who will pull Israel out of the rut it has been in for the past decade. Who are these people? We don’t know yet.
All we can hope is that they will show up soon, because Israel’s transition time is running out.
EDIT: Report: Livni Will Quit
(IsraelNN.com) Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni will announce her resignation from the government if Prime Minister Ehud Olmert does not resign, Israeli media reported Wednesday morning. She is scheduled to meet with the Prime Minister at 4 p.m. (9 a.m. EDT) and then will hold a press conference. The Foreign Minister was catapulted into the top political echelon when she backed former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's program to destroy Jewish communities in the Gaza and northern Samaria regions.

Friday, January 26, 2007

So I was reading up on Katsav...


The whole thing is crazy, and I'll get into my own opinions later (I think they mirror the general consensus anyway), but I there was a really ridiculous article about his speech yesterday on haaretz.com (http://www.haaretz.com/has
en/spages/817457.html
) and not that I'm defending Katsav, but this article is nothing short of published hate mail, and a bit disgraceful to the name of Haaretz, but ANYWAY the comments were far more interesting than the article itself.
It's always more interesting to know what people think than pre-biased journalists who may or may not represent anyone but themselves.So my favorite was this one, because I found it hilarious:
"Title: katsav the rapist Name: sympathetic
Did you get a look at Katsav`s wife? No wonder he was trying to force himself on all those young women. My god, could you imagine what it`s been like for him to go to bed with that ugly woman for all these years. Have some pity on the guy, you animals "
hahahahaha I liked this one too, because the second part really expressed what i felt, reading the article:
" Title: missing logic Name: kobi City: J-m State: Israel
Avirama, where is your logic? It was a great one-actor show. Journalists (including yourself) got a lot of hot material to write about... You should be satisfied. On the other hand, I find your terminology "captive audience"successful. In fact it exactly reflects what I feel when start browsing through our newspapers (including this article) in a hope to get some info and get instead mediocrity, bias, dirt. "
An interesting observation:
"Title: Katsav Name: Zappa City: Holon
Of 20 responses only 2 agree with Golan. Apparently Haaretz represents the opinion of only 10% of its readers. 90% support Katsav`s call for a hostile media reform and improvement in police hegemony. "
There are a bunch more to a similar effect. Then there are a few that made a bit less sense:
"Title: Poor Man`s Gideon Levy,Avirama Golan Name: Absolute Sweden State: SwedenRelegated to backpages of "Haaretz" despite writing basically identical text to Gideon`s one,adorning the front page.Is it because the "Haaretz" is sexist and piggishly man-dominated,eeh Avirama?So perhaps you should rather direct your flak at Amos Schocken instead of Pres.Katzav,Ms.Golan.Btw what an imperialist surname you bear,Avirama "
"Title: So what will the pals do with the million bullets you .. Name: Jerry City: Manchester
UK
whacko israelis gave to them?? " [HUH?]
More Annoyed ones:
"Title: OK. So give Israel back to the Europeans if Name: John City: NJ State: USA
you left wing BS israeli guys dont want it "
"Title: Keep tearing down your own country all you madmen Name: Peter J City: Westminster London
Only Almighty G-d protect the Holy Land "
hmm....interesting indeed.Overall, I think the majority consensus is still summarized best by:
"Title: Shame on "our" press, leave us alone already! Name: Gabi City: State: Israel
This repeated article of a single opinion is a bad product of what many brave people have fought for: The free press! Shame on them inflamers! We don`t need them to tell us what to do."the hostile media": a "powerful institution with an elitist, destructive and arrogant agenda that exerts extortionist power over the police, prosecution and attorney general"? YES! And we better get them worms to shut up soon. "
Funny how it's the Israelis that are commenting on the media (there was one comment by an Israeli saying that Matsav has disgraced everyone and should resign, but it did not encompass the passionate persiflage of the article) and people from the US and UK who are most aligning themselves with the article more...I think this all goes just to support my view.
I'm not defending Katsav in terms of the charges, once again, but it's really all entirely besides the point. Honestly, (though it is disgraceful, etc.) I don't really care if he's guilty or not, and I don't think anyone really does. The fact is that he is in a disgraceful situation as is right now, and he should resign, if for the sake of controversy at least. As president, it is his virtue to regard the country before his own honor. Ideally, I would say he should resign, and then contest the charges. More so, I'm (half-jokingly) pretty sure that the reason he hasn't done so is more because of his wife than anything else. If he were to resign, it would be like admitting to the allegations in a sort, and whereas Israel would eventually more or less forget about it, his wife sure as hell wouldn't. lol.In spite all of this, what's going on with Matsav is so minuscule and ridiculously off-base that it's a useless waste of media trash. Israel's got a lot more going on with it than the sexual life of its president (who, btw for Americans who may not know, does not serve the same function as an American president does - I think that's more the prime minister, but it's a different system all together). I guess it's a nice front page story for the New York Times to print several hundred times, and for people to whine about and analyze and whatever, but REALLY guys. I mean, there are just so many more important things...